"If they can get you asking the wrong questions, they don't have to worry about answers."
- Thomas Pynchon, Jr.
An effective tool for reinforcing the loony conspiricism meme is the introduction of
theories that that have no basis in evidence, such as the idea that no planes hit the towers. The association of these ideas with the careful research of investigators in the 9/11 Truth Movement stands to
set back the cause of awakening the larger public to the facts of the attack.
A series of websites have promoting more or less obvious hoaxes since the attack. Examples are 911Review.org (See 9/11 Review REVIEWED), and Physics911.net. Both adopted as their centerpiece
the idea that no jetliner crashed at the Pentagon -- an idea that may be single most elaborate and well-orchestrated hoax used to undermine the credibility of the 9-11 Truth Movement.
More traditional media such as videos and books have also been used to discourage rational inquiry into the crimes of 9/11/01 by associating alternatives to the official narrative uncritical thinking and junk science.
Several of these websites, videos, and books have been promoted in segments of the 9/11 Truth Movement that may seem surprising, given how effectively such material is used by the cover-up as ammunition against the spectrum of 9/11 Truth efforts. (A prime example of this is the March 2005 Popular Mechanics attack piece.) There are many possible reasons for this:
Because people inclined to accept that the attack was an inside job tend to be more open-minded in general, they are more likely to entertain a range of ideas, and are
somewhat handicapped in appreciating the potency of ill-founded or poorly presented theories in discrediting good research. Many working on social justice causes like 9/11 are reluctant to admit that
there are saboteurs in their midst. The idea that the struggle to expose the crime is just a contest between the official story and alternatives is comforting in its simplicity.
Recognizing that the struggle is a two-or-more-front war of ideas can be intimidating or even overwhelming. Hoaxes come in many levels of sophistication and subtlety. Whereas
few people have ever taken the hologram plane theory seriously, and the pod-plane theory was long ago rejected by most aspiring 9/11 activists, the Pentagon no-jetliner theory continues to detract from substantive evidence implicating insiders in the attack.
http://www.911review.com/disinfo/index.html
Yet somehow the worst arguments get more air play and capture more attention and so the “Truth” movement has become
dominated by the desire not to provide the most rational explanation but the one most opposite to the official story. Beyond providing endless distraction and requiring endless de-bunking (and they keep coming back!), this approach alienates intelligent skeptics, whom we need on our side.
Np. Pentagon - 3 m żelbetu - czyżby ?
http://frustratingfraud.blogspot.com/2006/11/three-rings-nine-feet-of-steel.html
itp. itd.
_________________
"I may not agree with what you say, but I'll defend to the death your right to say it"...Voltaire
Wiki2
Wykop2
Linki
Szukaj
Ekipa
Rejestracja
Zaloguj
