|
List otwarty Paula Grubacha mowiacy o tym wlasnie.Wolno bezkarnie osmiszac lub ublizac innym religiom,szczegolnie islamskiej ale wara od krytykowania holo-mitu.
"The French Government's hypocrisy, Islam and Holocaust revisionism (2)
> Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:44:29
A Second Open Letter to France's Ambassador to the US by Paul Grubach
Faurisson was severely injured in a nearly fatal attack on Sept. 16,
1989.
This is a Second Open Letter to France's Ambassador to the United
States by Paul Grubach February 8, 2008
Ambassador Pierre Vimont Embassy of France in the United States 4101
Reservoir Road, NW Washington, D. C. 20007
Dear Ambassador Vimont
As you are undoubtedly aware by now, Holocaust revisionist scholar
Dr. Robert Faurisson will probably stand trial for comments
he made at the Iran Holocaust Conference of December 2006.
Allegedly, he violated France's Gayssot Act, a statute passed in
1990 that prohibits any public doubt about the alleged Jewish
Holocaust.
There is a new development to this ongoing story that I would like
to bring to your attention.
On January 24, Dr. Faurisson was taken into police custody for
questioning and a search of his house was carried out. In my last
open letter to you of January 15, I brought attention to the
hypocritical double standard of the French government.
In September 2006, high school teacher Robert Redeker made a
scathing attack upon the Prophet Mohammed and the Islamic
religion in the center-right daily Le Figaro. Because of
threats to his life, he was forced to go into hiding.
The French government immediately came to his defense, offering him
police protection and a public statement on his behalf. In
reference to Redeker's case, former Prime Minister Dominique de
Villepin called the threats to his life "unacceptable," and added:
"We are in a democracy. Everyone has the right to express his views
freely, while respecting others, of course." (See The New York
Times, 30 September 2006, p. A 3)
That this is an outrageous lie is demonstrated by the ongoing plight
of Dr. Faurisson. In 1991, French "democracy" demanded that Dr.
Faurisson be removed from his university chair. In July 2006, French
"democracy" again violated his inalienable right to freedom of
speech and research. He was convicted of "Holocaust denial"
by a Paris court over remarks he made on Iranian television, and was
given a three-month suspended prison term and he has to pay 18 000
euros.
Clearly, as the cases of Redeker and Faurisson show, one has the
right to attack and violate the sacred beliefs of Muslims, but one
has no right whatsoever to question and repudiate the Holocaust
doctrine, one of the most sacred beliefs of Jewish-Zionism.
The sacred belief and taboo of the Jewish people is enshrined in law
in France. If you contest the Holocaust, you are prosecuted and
persecuted.
However, the sacred beliefs of Muslims are not enshrined in law. If
you attack Muslim beliefs, this is depicted as an expression of
"freedom of speech." Once again, this is evidence of a hypocritical
double standard. I have come across another case which further
bolsters my point.
Do you recognize the name of the French Jewish writer, Marek Halter?
He co-founded the so-called "anti-racist" group, SOS-Racisme. There
is an interview of him in the February 11, 2005 issue of the English
edition of The International Jerusalem Post, (pp. 9-11).
Halter claims that France's rapidly growing Islamic population is
too frequently incompatible with democracy. Let me give you
two of his direct quotes. Halter stated: "All of a sudden we realize
that they [Muslims] are not a small minority anymore and that the
way most of them practice their religion is not compatible with
French democratic principles." He also stated: "Muslims threaten to
weaken a French democracy that no longer knows how to impose its
rules without seeming oppressive."
In April 2007 the European Union made inciting racism and xenophobia
crimes throughout its 27 member states in a landmark decision. Even
before April 2007, when Halter made these statements, inciting
racism and xenophobia in France were outlawed.
That is to say, Halter made these statements when these "racism and
xenophobia" laws were on the books. A French prosecutor could
cogently argue that Halter's statements incite hatred and xenophobia
against Muslims, and thus, the man should be prosecuted. After all,
he is stating that Muslims as a group threaten to weaken and even
destroy French "democracy."
This will cause people to hate Muslims. Your so-called French
"democracy" allows him to make anti-Muslim statements. Yet, Robert
Faurisson is put on trial by this same French "democracy" for making
statements that contest and debunk Holocaust orthodoxy.
Do you see my point, Ambassador Vimont? France grants "freedom of
speech" to Jewish people like Marek Halter who criticize and attack
Muslims. Yet, "democratic" France denies freedom of speech to non-
Jews like Faurisson who question and debunk the orthodox view of the
Holocaust.
If France was truly a democracy as former Prime Minister de Villepin
claims, it would defend Dr. Faurisson's right to freedom of research
on the Holocaust. That is to say, there would be no "limits in
advance" or "prewritten conclusions" about his Holocaust research.
After all, France grants freedom of research for atheists and others
who deny the existence of God or attack the Islamic and Christian
religions.
If the French government does prosecute and imprison Dr. Faurisson
for his Holocaust revisionist views, this will only demonstrate to
the world the truth of his arguments. The French government cannot
disprove his Holocaust revisionism with reason and science, but must
resort to oppressive laws and prison sentences in its attempt to
silence truth.
Sincerely, Paul Grubach
A copy of this letter has been sent to Press TV
Podrzucil
Jerzy
|
Wiki2
Wykop2
Linki
Szukaj
Ekipa
Rejestracja
Zaloguj
