privilege
czy możesz dodać małe linki pod punktami Czy wiesz że?
link do danego artykułu opisujący szerzej punkt.
zamiast sprawdź sam
forum.php
odpowiedni artykuł - bo jak wpuścisz czlowieka na główna stronę forum - to wymięknie nim dotrze do artykułu o grypie.
trzeba to podać na talerzu
poza tym świetny plakat.
_________________ Kiedy wyeliminuje się wszytko co niemożliwe, cokolwiek pozostanie, choćby nie wiem jak nieprawdopodobne, musi być prawdą."
Dołączył: 04 Sie 2009 Posty: 3
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 15:13, 07 Sie '09
Temat postu:
Bez obrazy panowie (privilege, NWOPL) - wielki plus za to ze robicie akcję ulotkową, ALE:
umieszczając na ulotkach odnosniki do takich stron jak to forum czy newworldorder, sprawicie jedynie, ze osoba ktora trafi tu po raz pierwszy wlozy sprawę z niebezpieczenstwem szczepien na świnską grypę między bajki i nigdy wiecej juz tym tematem się nie zainteresuje.
Dodając adres np. do tego forum wywolacie jedynie efekt odwrotny od zamierzonego. Informacje się dawkuje, a nie zrzuca się na przeciętnego Kowalskiego bomby w postaci tego forum.
Zamiast kombinowac z nadmiararem adresow do stron www, proponowalbym PRZECZYTAĆ choc raz po napisaniu wypuszczoną ulotkę i popracowac nad gramatyką i interpunkcją, ponieważ tego rodzaju bledy dla wielu osob od razu są dyskredytujące, jesli idzie o wiarygodność tekstu i profesjonalizm osob, ktore ten tekst tworzyly.
Wielki plus za rozpoczęcie akcji, ale jezeli chcecie KOGOKOLWIEK przekonac, to robcie to z głową, bo brakiem profesjonalizmu i nadmiarem informacji (przedstawionych w sposob sensacyjny), odstraszycie jedynie niczego nieświadomych obywateli.
Dołączył: 20 Sie 2005 Posty: 20417
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 15:48, 07 Sie '09
Temat postu:
ya napisał:
privilege
czy możesz dodać małe linki pod punktami Czy wiesz że?
link do danego artykułu opisujący szerzej punkt.
zamiast sprawdź sam
forum.php
odpowiedni artykuł - bo jak wpuścisz czlowieka na główna stronę forum - to wymięknie nim dotrze do artykułu o grypie.
trzeba to podać na talerzu
poza tym świetny plakat.
mogę zrobić skrót np. prawda2.info/grypa prowadzący do jakiegoś tematu na forum albo hasła na wiki.
privilege
czy możesz dodać małe linki pod punktami Czy wiesz że?
link do danego artykułu opisujący szerzej punkt.
zamiast sprawdź sam
forum.php
odpowiedni artykuł - bo jak wpuścisz czlowieka na główna stronę forum - to wymięknie nim dotrze do artykułu o grypie.
trzeba to podać na talerzu
poza tym świetny plakat.
mogę zrobić skrót np. prawda2.info/grypa prowadzący do jakiegoś tematu na forum albo hasła na wiki.
dobry pomysl.wtedy bedzie wszystko w jednym miejscu
_________________ NIE DAJ SIE ZASZCZEPIC PRZECIW GRYPIE!!!!!!!!!!!
możecie wygenerować plik w lepszej rozdziałce - żeby każdy mógł sobie pobrać i wydrukować w wysokiej rozdzielczosci... a pozatym można własnie linki podawać z podobnymi plakatami... dobry myk
Retired Vax Scientist Would
Never Vaccinate His Kids
From Ken Adachi
8-6-9
"If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination."
-Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport
Editor's Note -- This interview was posted by Jon Rappoport in early January 2002. You will discover by reading it that the very issues we now face of FORCED vaccination of a laboratory-created vaccine to "protect" us against a laboratory-created "disease" (Swine Flu, Bird flu, etc.) was set into motion a long time ago.
The vaccine researcher quoted here flat out says that the World Homicide Organization, WHO, is driven by a DEPOPULATION agenda, and that many African leaders know full well that the explosive spread of HIV and AIDS in Africa was caused by WHO-sponsored vaccinations of the 1970s.
This former pharmaceutical insider also debunks the widespread ASSUMPTIONS of vaccine "safety" promoted by orthodox medicine, the CDC, the National Institute of Health, state health departments, and their compliant media propagandists who are all parroting SUPERSTITIONS, rather than FACTS. --Ken Adachi
Retired Vaccine Researcher to Jon Rappoport: "If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination." (Aug. 6, 2009)
Jon Rappoport (Q) Interviews a Retired Vaccine Researcher (A) (given the pseudonym of "Dr. Mark Randall")
Q: You were once certain that vaccines were the hallmark of good medicine.
A: Yes I was. I helped develop a few vaccines. I won't say which ones.
Q: Why not?
A: I want to preserve my privacy.
Q: So you think you could have problems if you came out into the open?
A: I believe I could lose my pension.
Q: On what grounds?
A: The grounds don't matter. These people have ways of causing you problems, when you were once part of the Club. I know one or two people who were put under surveillance, who were harassed.
Q: Harassed by whom?
A: The FBI.
Q: Really?
A: Sure. The FBI used other pretexts. And the IRS can come calling too.
Q: So much for free speech.
A: I was "part of the inner circle." If now I began to name names and make specific accusations against researchers, I could be in a world of trouble.
Q: What is at the bottom of these efforts at harassment?
A: Vaccines are the last defense of modern medicine. Vaccines are the ultimate justification for the overall "brilliance" of modern medicine.
Q: Do you believe that people should be allowed to choose whether they should get vaccines?
A: On a political level, yes. On a scientific level, people need information, so that they can choose well. It's one thing to say choice is good. But if the atmosphere is full of lies, how can you choose? Also, if the FDA were run by honorable people, these vaccines would not be granted licenses. They would be investigated to within an inch of their lives.
Q: There are medical historians who state that the overall decline of illnesses was not due to vaccines.
A: I know. For a long time, I ignored their work.
Q: Why?
A: Because I was afraid of what I would find out. I was in the business of developing vaccines. My livelihood depended on continuing that work.
Q: And then?
A: I did my own investigation.
Q: What conclusions did you come to?
A: The decline of disease is due to improved living conditions.
Q: What conditions?
A: Cleaner water. Advanced sewage systems. Nutrition. Fresher food. A decrease in poverty. Germs may be everywhere, but when you are healthy, you don't contract the diseases as easily.
Q: What did you feel when you completed your own investigation?
A: Despair. I realized I was working a sector based on a collection of lies.
Q: Are some vaccines more dangerous than others?
A: Yes. The DPT shot, for example. The MMR. But some lots of a vaccine are more dangerous than other lots of the same vaccine. As far as I'm concerned, all vaccines are dangerous.
Q: Why?
A: Several reasons. They involve the human immune system in a process that tends to compromise immunity. They can actually cause the disease they are supposed to prevent. They can cause other diseases than the ones they are supposed to prevent.
Q: Why are we quoted statistics which seem to prove that vaccines have been tremendously successful at wiping out diseases?
A: Why? To give the illusion that these vaccines are useful. If a vaccine suppresses visible symptoms of a disease like measles, everyone assumes that the vaccine is a success. But, under the surface, the vaccine can harm the immune system itself. And if it causes other diseases -- say, meningitis -- that fact is masked, because no one believes that the vaccine can do that. The connection is overlooked.
Q: It is said that the smallpox vaccine wiped out smallpox in England.
A: Yes. But when you study the available statistics, you get another picture.
Q: Which is?
A: There were cities in England where people who were not vaccinated did not get smallpox. There were places where people who were vaccinated experienced smallpox epidemics. And smallpox was already on the decline before the vaccine was introduced.
Q: So you're saying that we have been treated to a false history.
A: Yes. That's exactly what I'm saying. This is a history that has been cooked up to convince people that vaccines are invariably safe and effective.
Q: Now, you worked in labs. Where purity was an issue.
A: The public believes that these labs, these manufacturing facilities are the cleanest places in the world. That is not true. Contamination occurs all the time. You get all sorts of debris introduced into vaccines.
Q: For example, the SV40 monkey virus slips into the polio vaccine.
A: Well yes, that happened. But that's not what I mean. The SV40 got into the polio vaccine because the vaccine was made by using monkey kidneys. But I'm talking about something else. The actual lab conditions. The mistakes. The careless errors. SV40, which was later found in cancer tumors -- that was what I would call a structural problem. It was an accepted part of the manufacturing process. If you use monkey kidneys, you open the door to germs which you don't know are in those kidneys.
Q: Okay, but let's ignore that distinction between different types of contaminants for a moment. What contaminants did you find in your many years of work with vaccines?
A: All right. I'll give you some of what I came across, and I'll also give you what colleagues of mine found. Here's a partial list. In the Rimavex measles vaccine, we found various chicken viruses. In polio vaccine, we found acanthamoeba, which is a so-called "brain-eating" amoeba.
Simian cytomegalovirus in polio vaccine. Simian foamy virus in the rotavirus vaccine. Bird-cancer viruses in the MMR vaccine. Various micro-organisms in the anthrax vaccine. I've found potentially dangerous enzyme inhibitors in several vaccines. Duck, dog, and rabbit viruses in the rubella vaccine. Avian leucosis virus in the flu vaccine. Pestivirus in the MMR vaccine.
Q: Let me get this straight. These are all contaminants which don't belong in the vaccines.
A: That's right. And if you try to calculate what damage these contaminants can cause, well, we don't really know, because no testing has been done, or very little testing. It's a game of roulette. You take your chances. Also, most people don't know that some polio vaccines, adenovirus vaccines, rubella and hep A and measles vaccines have been made with aborted human fetal tissue. I have found what I believed were bacterial fragments and poliovirus in these vaccines from time to time -- which may have come from that fetal tissue. When you look for contaminants in vaccines, you can come up with material that IS puzzling. You know it shouldn't be there, but you don't know exactly what you've got. I have found what I believed was a very small "fragment" of human hair and also human mucus. I have found what can only be called "foreign protein," which could mean almost anything. It could mean protein from viruses.
Q: Alarm bells are ringing all over the place.
A: How do you think I felt? Remember, this material is going into the bloodstream without passing through some of the ordinary immune defenses.
Q: How were your findings received?
A: Basically, it was, don't worry, this can't be helped. In making vaccines, you use various animals' tissue, and that's where this kind of contamination enters in. Of course, I'm not even mentioning the standard chemicals like formaldehyde, mercury, and aluminum which are purposely put into vaccines.
Q: This information is pretty staggering.
A: Yes. And I'm just mentioning some of the biological contaminants. Who knows how many others there are? Others we don't find because we don't think to look for them. If tissue from, say, a bird is used to make a vaccine, how many possible germs can be in that tissue? We have no idea. We have no idea what they might be, or what effects they could have on humans.
Q: And beyond the purity issue?
A: You are dealing with the basic faulty premise about vaccines. That they intricately stimulate the immune system to create the conditions for immunity from disease. That is the bad premise. It doesn't work that way. A vaccine is supposed to "create" antibodies which, indirectly, offer protection against disease. However, the immune system is much larger and more involved than antibodies and their related "killer cells."
Q: The immune system is?
A: The entire body, really. Plus the mind. It's all immune system, you might say. That is why you can have, in the middle of an epidemic, those individuals who remain healthy.
Q: So the level of general health is important.
A: More than important. Vital.
Q: How are vaccine statistics falsely presented?
A: There are many ways. For example, suppose that 25 people who have received the hepatitis B vaccine come down with hepatitis. Well, hep B is a liver disease. But you can call liver disease many things. You can change the diagnosis. Then, you've concealed the root cause of the problem.
Q: And that happens?
A: All the time. It HAS to happen, if the doctors automatically assume that people who get vaccines DO NOT come down with the diseases they are now supposed to be protected from. And that is exactly what doctors assume. You see, it's circular reasoning. It's a closed system. It admits no fault. No possible fault. If a person who gets a vaccine against hepatitis gets hepatitis, or gets some other disease, the automatic assumption is, this had nothing to do with the disease.
Q: In your years working in the vaccine establishment, how many doctors did you encounter who admitted that vaccines were a problem?
A: None. There were a few who privately questioned what they were doing. But they would never go public, even within their companies.
Q: What was the turning point for you?
A: I had a friend whose baby died after a DPT shot.
Q: Did you investigate?
A: Yes, informally. I found that this baby was completely healthy before the vaccination. There was no reason for his death, except the vaccine. That started my doubts. Of course, I wanted to believe that the baby had gotten a bad shot from a bad lot. But as I looked into this further, I found that was not the case in this instance. I was being drawn into a spiral of doubt that increased over time. I continued to investigate. I found that, contrary to what I thought, vaccines are not tested in a scientific way.
Q: What do you mean?
A: For example, no long-term studies are done on any vaccines. Long-term follow-up is not done in any careful way. Why? Because, again, the assumption is made that vaccines do not cause problems. So why should anyone check? On top of that, a vaccine reaction is defined so that all bad reactions are said to occur very soon after the shot is given. But that does not make sense.
Q: Why doesn't it make sense?
A: Because the vaccine obviously acts in the body for a long period of time after it is given. A reaction can be gradual. Deterioration can be gradual. Neurological problems can develop over time. They do in various conditions, even according to a conventional analysis. So why couldn't that be the case with vaccines? If chemical poisoning can occur gradually, why couldn't that be the case with a vaccine which contains mercury?
Q: And that is what you found?
A: Yes. You are dealing with correlations, most of the time.Correlations are not perfect. But if you get 500 parents whose children have suffered neurological damage during a one-year period after having a vaccine, this should be sufficient to spark off an intense investigation.
Q: Has it been enough?
A: No. Never. This tells you something right away.
Q: Which is?
A: The people doing the investigation are not really interested in looking at the facts. They assume that the vaccines are safe. So, when they do investigate, they invariably come up with exonerations of the vaccines. They say, "This vaccine is safe." But what do they base those judgments on? They base them on definitions and ideas which automatically rule out a condemnation of the vaccine.
Q: There are numerous cases where a vaccine campaign has failed. Where people have come down with the disease against which they were vaccinated.
A: Yes, there are many such instances. And there the evidence is simply ignored. It's discounted. The experts say, if they say anything at all, that this is just an isolated situation, but overall the vaccine has been shown to be safe. But if you add up all the vaccine campaigns where damage and disease have occurred, you realize that these are NOT isolated situations.
Q: Did you ever discuss what we are talking about here with colleagues, when you were still working in the vaccine establishment?
A: Yes I did.
Q: What happened?
A: Several times I was told to keep quiet. It was made clear that I should go back to work and forget my misgivings. On a few occasions, I encountered fear. Colleagues tried to avoid me. They felt they could be labeled with "guilt by association." All in all, though, I behaved myself.I made sure I didn't create problems for myself.
Q: If vaccines actually do harm, why are they given?
A: First of all, there is no "if." They do harm. It becomes a more difficult question to decide whether they do harm in those people who seem to show no harm. Then you are dealing with the kind of research which should be done, but isn't. Researchers should be probing to discover a kind of map, or flow chart, which shows exactly what vaccines do in the body from the moment they enter. This research has not been done. As to why they are given, we could sit here for two days and discuss all the reasons. As you've said many times, at different layers of the system people have their motives. Money, fear of losing a job, the desire to win brownie points, prestige, awards, promotion, misguided idealism, unthinking habit, and so on. But, at the highest levels of the medical cartel, vaccines are a top priority because they cause a weakening of the immune system. I know that may be hard to accept, but it's true. The medical cartel, at the highest level, is not out to help people, it is out to harm them, to weaken them. To kill them. At one point in my career, I had a long conversation with a man who occupied a high government position in an African nation. He told me that he was well aware of this. He told me that WHO is a front for these depopulation interests. There is an underground, shall we say, in Africa, made up of various officials who are earnestly trying to change the lot of the poor. This network of people knows what is going on. They know that vaccines have been used, and are being used, to destroy their countries, to make them ripe for takeover by globalist powers. I have had the opportunity to speak with several of these people from this network.
Q: Is Thabo Mbeki, the president of South Africa, aware of the situation?
A: I would say he is partially aware. Perhaps he is not utterly convinced, but he is on the way to realizing the whole truth. He already knows that HIV is a hoax. He knows that the AIDS drugs are poisons which destroy the immune system. He also knows that if he speaks out, in any way, about the vaccine issue, he will be branded a lunatic. He has enough trouble after his stand on the AIDS issue.
Q: This network you speak of.
A: It has accumulated a huge amount of information about vaccines. The question is, how is a successful strategy going to be mounted? For these people, that is a difficult issue.
Q: And in the industrialized nations?
A: The medical cartel has a stranglehold, but it is diminishing. Mainly because people have the freedom to question medicines. However, if the choice issue [the right to take or reject any medicine] does not gather steam, these coming mandates about vaccines against biowarefare germs are going to win out. This is an important time.
Q: The furor over the hepatits B vaccine seems one good avenue.
A: I think so, yes. To say that babies must have the vaccine-and then in the next breath, admitting that a person gets hep B from sexual contacts and shared needles -- is a ridiculous juxtaposition. Medical authorities try to cover themselves by saying that 20,000 or so children in the US get hep B every year from "unknown causes," and that's why every baby must have the vaccine. I dispute that 20,00 figure and the so-called studies that back it up.
Q: Andrew Wakefield, the British MD who uncovered the link between the MMR vaccine and autism, has just been fired from his job in a London hospital.
A: Yes. Wakefield performed a great service. His correlations between the vaccine and autism are stunning. Perhaps you know that Tony Blair's wife is involved with alternative health. There is the possibility that their child has not been given the MMR. Blair recently side-stepped the question in press interviews, and made it seem that he was simply objecting to invasive questioning of his "personal and family life." In any event, I believe his wife has been muzzled. I think, if given the chance, she would at least say she is sympathetic to all the families who have come forward and stated that their children were severely damaged by the MMR.
Q: British reporters should try to get through to her.
A: They have been trying. But I think she has made a deal with her husband to keep quiet, no matter what. She could do a great deal of good if she breaks her promise. I have been told she is under pressure, and not just from her husband. At the level she occupies, MI6 and British health authorities get into the act. It is thought of as a matter of national security.
Q: Well, it is national security, once you understand the medical cartel.
A: It is global security. The cartel operates in every nation. It zealously guards the sanctity of vaccines. Questioning these vaccines is on the same level as a Vatican bishop questioning the sanctity of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the Catholic Church.
Q: I know that a Hollywood celebrity stating publicly that he will not take a vaccine is committing career suicide.
A: Hollywood is linked very powerfully to the medical cartel. There are several reasons, but one of them is simply that an actor who is famous can draw a huge amount of publicity if he says ANYTHING. In 1992, I was present at your demonstration against the FDA in downtown Los Angeles. One or two actors spoke against the FDA. Since that time, you would be hard pressed to find an actor who has spoken out in any way against the medical cartel.
Q: Within the National Institutes of Health, what is the mood, what is the basic frame of mind?
A: People are competing for research monies. The last thing they think about is challenging the status quo. They are already in an intramural war for that money. They don't need more trouble. This is a very insulated system. It depends on the idea that, by and large, modern medicine is very successful on every frontier. To admit systemic problems in any area is to cast doubt on the whole enterprise. You might therefore think that NIH is the last place one should think about holding demonstrations. But just the reverse is true. If five thousand people showed up there demanding an accounting of the actual benefits of that research system, demanding to know what real health benefits have been conferred on the public from the billions of wasted dollars funneled to that facility, something might start. A spark might go off. You might get, with further demonstrations, all sorts of fall-out. Researchers -- a few -- might start leaking information.
Q: A good idea.
A: People in suits standing as close to the buildings as the police will allow. People in business suits, in jogging suits, mothers and babies. Well-off people. Poor people. All sorts of people.
Q: What about the combined destructive power of a number of vaccines given to babies these days?
A: It is a travesty and a crime. There are no real studies of any depth which have been done on that. Again, the assumption is made that vaccines are safe, and therefore any number of vaccines given together are safe as well. But the truth is, vaccines are not safe. Therefore the potential damage increases when you give many of them in a short time period.
Q: Then we have the fall flu season.
A: Yes. As if only in the autumn do these germs float in to the US from Asia. The public swallows that premise. If it happens in April, it is a bad cold. If it happens in October, it is the flu.
Q: Do you regret having worked all those years in the vaccine field?
A: Yes. But after this interview, I'll regret it a little less. And I work in other ways. I give out information to certain people, when I think they will use it well.
Q: What is one thing you want the public to understand?
A: That the burden of proof in establishing the safety and efficacy of vaccines is on the people who manufacture and license them for public use. Just that. The burden of proof is not on you or me. And for proof you need well-designed long-term studies. You need extensive follow-up. You need to interview mothers and pay attention to what mothers say about their babies and what happens to them after vaccination. You need all these things. The things that are not there.
Q: The things that are not there.
A: Yes.
Q: To avoid any confusion, I'd like you to review, once more, the disease problems that vaccines can cause. Which diseases, how that happens.
A: We are basically talking about two potential harmful outcomes. One, the person gets the disease from the vaccine. He gets the disease which the vaccine is supposed to protect him from. Because, some version of the disease is in the vaccine to begin with. Or two, he doesn't get THAT disease, but at some later time, maybe right away, maybe not, he develops another condition which is caused by the vaccine. That condition could be autism, what's called autism, or it could be some other disease like meningitis. He could become mentally disabled.
Q: Is there any way to compare the relative frequency of these different outcomes?
A: No. Because the follow-up is poor. We can only guess. If you ask, out of a population of a hundred thousand children who get a measles vaccine, how many get the measles, and how many develop other problems from the vaccine, there is a no reliable answer. That is what I'm saying. Vaccines are superstitions. And with superstitions, you don't get facts you can use. You only get stories, most of which are designed to enforce the superstition. But, from many vaccine campaigns, we can piece together a narrative that does reveal some very disturbing things. People have been harmed. The harm is real, and it can be deep and it can mean death. The harm is NOT limited to a few cases, as we have been led to believe.In the US, there are groups of mothers who are testifying about autism and childhood vaccines. They are coming forward and standing up at meetings.They are essentially trying to fill in the gap that has been created by the researchers and doctors who turn their backs on the whole thing.
Q: Let me ask you this. If you took a child in, say, Boston and you raised that child with good nutritious food and he exercised every day and he was loved by his parents, and he didn't get the measles vaccine, what would be his health status compared with the average child in Boston who eats poorly and watches five hours of TV a day and gets the measles vaccine?
A: Of course there are many factors involved, but I would bet on the better health status for the first child. If he gets measles, if he gets it when he is nine, the chances are it will be much lighter than the measles the second child might get. I would bet on the first child every time.
Q: How long did you work with vaccines?
A: A long time. Longer than ten years.
Q: Looking back now, can you recall any good reason to say that vaccines are successful?
A: No, I can't. If I had a child now, the last thing I would allow is vaccination. I would move out of the state if I had to. I would change the family name. I would disappear. With my family. I'm not saying it would come to that. There are ways to sidestep the system with grace, if you know how to act. There are exemptions you can declare, in every state, based on religious and/or philosophic views. But if push came to shove, I would go on the move.
Q: And yet there are children everywhere who do get vaccines and appear to be healthy.
A: The operative word is "appear." What about all the children who can't focus on their studies? What about the children who have tantrums from time to time? What about the children who are not quite in possession of all their mental faculties? I know there are many causes for these things, but vaccines are one cause. I would not take the chance. I see no reason to take the chance. And frankly, I see no reason to allow the government to have the last word. Government medicine is, from my experience, often a contradiction in terms. You get one or the other, but not both.
Q: So we come to the level playing field.
A: Yes. Allow those who want the vaccines to take them. Allow the dissidents to decline to take them. But, as I said earlier, there is no level playing field if the field is strewn with lies. And when babies are involved, you have parents making all the decisions. Those parents need a heavy dose of truth. What about the child I spoke of who died from the DPT shot? What information did his parents act on? I can tell you it was heavily weighted. It was not real information.
Q: Medical PR people, in concert with the press, scare the hell out of parents with dire scenarios about what will happen if their kids don't get shots.
A: They make it seem a crime to refuse the vaccine. They equate it with bad parenting. You fight that with better information. It is always a challenge to buck the authorities. And only you can decide whether to do it. It is every person's responsibility to make up his mind. The medical cartel likes that bet. It is betting that the fear will win.
Dr. Mark Randall is the pseudonym of a vaccine researcher who worked for many years in the labs of major pharmaceutical houses and the US government's National Institutes of Health.
Mark retired during the last decade. He says he was "disgusted with what he discovered about vaccines."
As you know, since the beginning of nomorefakenews, I have been launching an attack against non-scientific and dangerous assertions about the safety and efficacy of vaccines.
Mark has been one of my sources.
He is a little reluctant to speak out, even under the cover of anonymity, but with the current push to make vaccines mandatory -- with penalties like quarantine lurking in the wings -- he has decided to break his silence.
He lives comfortably in retirement, but like many of my long-time sources, he has developed a conscience about his former work. Mark is well aware of the scope of the medical cartel and its goals of depopulation, mind control, and general debilitation of populations.
Jon Rappoport
_________________ Referendum to inicjowanie dobrych oraz wetowanie wrogich nam ustaw. To sprawdzilo sie w Szwajacarii.
Skonczmy z partiokracja.
Demokracjabezposrednia.org
*Nie odpowiadam na posty lekcewazace i niskiego poziomu.
napisze 2-3 zdania dotyczące plakatu (nie chcę krytykowac - super że ktoś coś robi) ale chciałbym coś dodac aby to było lepsze.
- powinien to jakiś copywriter przemyśleć - ulotka odstrasza - i nie wiem czy zachęca do wejścia na strony internetowe
- 3 linki to za dużo - powinien być jeden duży - aby czytający go zapamiętał
- powinien być jeden jasny przekaz - poczytaj o szczepionce na www - albo coś innego - w zależności na jaki przekaz stawiamy (szczepionka to zło, szczepionka zabija, grypa świńska to ściema etc.)
- plakat powinien być prosty w formie - podstawowe treści czyli "szczepionka na grype (świńską) to zło powinny być z daleka widoczne
boję się że ludzie mają w dupie wszystko i nie będą tego czytać - dlatego należy zadziałać na podświadomość - taki pierwsze skojarzenia - aby przekaz był "podprogowy" - i czytelnik biegnąc do pracy mógł to zobaczyć i podświadomie zapamiętać - jeden plakat oleje ... drugi zapamięta ... może jak zobaczy 3 to sie zainteresuje a przy 4 spisze adres.
dlatego bardzo ważna jest budowa oraz treść plakatu.
ps. jak coś mogę pomóc zaprojektować - mam spore doświadczenie - poproszę teksty na PW poprawię coś i powinno być lepiej (jednak pomoc jakiegoś copywritera mocno wskazana - może jest ktoś taki na forum?)
Dołączył: 28 Sie 2008 Posty: 173
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 00:37, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
Plakat jak plakat, robiony w pośpiechu więc można przyczepić się do szczegółów, ale ogólnie to dobra robota. Ostatnia forma plakatu od privilege jest ok, wali prosto między oczy treścią i o to właśnie chodzi... fraza "czy wiesz, że..." przyciąga na pewno. Każdy może przerobić te plakaty na swój sposób graficznie, następnie drukować i puszczać w miasto. U mnie na przykład ulotki znikają jak świeże bułeczki Część z nich umieściłem pod osłoną nocy w skrzynkach pocztowych na osiedlu. Na jutro przygotowane są już plakaty samoprzylepne... na słupy ogłoszeniowe . Najgorsze w tym wszystkim jest to, że żona zaczyna się o mnie martwić... myśli, że mi odbiło
Dołączył: 08 Sie 2009 Posty: 30
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 01:07, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
Przechodzi ludzkie pojecie.
Pracuje dla znanej wam dobrze firmy StatoilHydro na rafinerii w Norwegii. Pracuje w systemie rotacyjnym 12 w pracy i 9 w domu w PL. Jak zatem domyslacie sie duzo podrozuje samolotem. Patrzcie na tresc maila, ktorego otrzymalem od firmy.
"Hei,
Vedlagt informasjon om Influensa A (H1N1). Vennligst gjør dere kjent med innholdet i denne meldingen og ta nødvendige aksjoner.
Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards
Kjetil Svindland | Anskaffelsesdirektør / Vice President Procurement"
Jestem w szoku. Faktycznie musi byc cos na rzeczy skoro to dzieje sie na taka skale. Powiedzcie mi po kiego wala oni mi to przyslali? Propaganda bezposrednia. Zawsze wydawalo mi sie, ze Norwegia jest troszke na dystans z NWO.
napisze 2-3 zdania dotyczące plakatu (nie chcę krytykowac - super że ktoś coś robi) ale chciałbym coś dodac aby to było lepsze.
Nic nie przeszkadza aby funkcjonowało więcej różnych ulotek. Odniosłem podobne wrażenie jak ty, ale pozwólmy rozpowszechniać tą jaka jest. Widzę, że się znasz w temacie więc oczekuje na twoje projekty. Ja nie z tej branży więc nie mogę pomóc.
Dołączył: 05 Mar 2009 Posty: 1459
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 08:48, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
W sprawie ulotki ...
Proponuję aby na odwrocie tej małej ulotki umieścić ten tekst ...
___________________________________________________
Zanim dasz się ukłuć niech to podpiszą !!!
Ja ........................ oświadczam,że szczepionka (nazwa,producent,nr
serii) ............................................ przeciwko
....................... ,którą zaaplikowałem/am (imię i nazwisko )
........................................ dnia .......... w
(przychodnia,szpital) ........................................ jest
szczepionką w pełni bezpieczną dla życia i zdrowia . Zapewniam, że po
zaszczepieniu nie wystąpi choroba, przeciwko której szczepionka została
przygotowana i wykonano szczepienie oraz nie wystąpią żadne inne
powikłania bezpośrednie* czy zgon.
Oświadczam, że jako lekarz jestem zaznajomiony/a z ustawą o niekorzystnym
wpływie szczepień (Dz.Ust.Nr 241 poz.2097 - 'Rozporządzenie Ministra
Zdrowia z dn. 23.12.2002 r. w sprawie niepożądanych odczynów
poszczepiennych). W wypadku wystąpienia jakichkolwiek fizycznych lub
psychicznych powikłań poszczepiennych i ich następstw jako osoba
odpowiedzialna za zaszczepienie zobowiązuję się zapłacić stosowne
odszkodowanie w wysokości ...................................zł (jako
koszty leczenia, rehabilitacji i opieki) w stosunku do ofiary lub jego
rodziców/opiekunów prawnych jeśli w wyniku tej szczepionki dozna urazów
czy upośledzenia.
Niniejsze oświadczenie stanowi również podstawę do dochodzenia pośrednich
odszkodowań od firm czy instytucji mogących być powiązanych z tą sprawą na
drodze sądowej w oparciu o stosowne przepisy prawa polskiego lub dekretów
prawnych Unii Europejskiej.
............................................. ......
........................................
miejscowość dnia
............................................. ...........
.....................................
podpis lekarza w pełnym brzmieniu pieczątka lekarza.
_________________ Gaza Strefa śmierci
Dołączył: 05 Mar 2009 Posty: 1459
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 09:50, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
moteq napisał:
Przechodzi ludzkie pojecie.
Pracuje dla znanej wam dobrze firmy StatoilHydro na rafinerii w Norwegii. Pracuje w systemie rotacyjnym 12 w pracy i 9 w domu w PL. Jak zatem domyslacie sie duzo podrozuje samolotem. Patrzcie na tresc maila, ktorego otrzymalem od firmy.
"Hei,
Vedlagt informasjon om Influensa A (H1N1). Vennligst gjør dere kjent med innholdet i denne meldingen og ta nødvendige aksjoner.
Med vennlig hilsen / Best regards
Kjetil Svindland | Anskaffelsesdirektør / Vice President Procurement"
Jestem w szoku. Faktycznie musi byc cos na rzeczy skoro to dzieje sie na taka skale. Powiedzcie mi po kiego wala oni mi to przyslali? Propaganda bezposrednia. Zawsze wydawalo mi sie, ze Norwegia jest troszke na dystans z NWO.
W sumie to wstawiłeś tylko nagłówek
brzmi mniej więcej tak
W załączniku informacje o Grypie A (H1N1). Proszę zapoznać się z treścią tego komunikatu i podjęcie niezbędnych działań.
wstaw załacznik najlepiej w PL...
Ps..Skąd pomysł że Norwegia jest daleka od NWO ?
Może cała Skandynawia to dla elity czysty zakątek który sobie zachowają ,
w sumie to tam buduje się banki nasion http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/1464398,242,kioskart.html
wiec stąd pozorny spokój
Dołączył: 08 Sie 2009 Posty: 30
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 12:01, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
Mi sie wydaje, ze Norwegia to strasznie hermetyczne spoleczenstwo. Wystarczy spojrzec na polki w sklepach, nie znajdziecie tam nutelli ani presila. Widac, ze sa na dystans z Europa i UE.
Jutro lece do pracy i dowiem sie wiecej.
_________________ Haufenweise Scheisse...
times ladnie podsumowal kto zarabia na swinskiej grypie
Cytat:
Kto zarabia na świńskiej grypie?
Kto by pomyślał, że gorączka i ból mięśni przyniosą aż takie dochody? Niekończące się nagłówki na temat świńskiej grypy i sprzeczne zalecenia (zamykać szkoły albo nie zamykać szkół, ciężarne powinny albo nie powinny korzystać z publicznego transportu) stworzyły okazję dla przedsiębiorczych jednostek. Kiedy jedni panikują, inni liczą zyski.
Firmy farmaceutyczne
Ceny akcji Roche oszalały. Zyski firm farmaceutycznych w obliczu pandemii idą w górę szybciej niż rtęć w termometrze. Oczekuje się, że do końca roku Roche sprzeda Tamiflu za 2 miliardy franków szwajcarskich - mało kto jednak wie, że lek został opracowany przez inną firmę, Gilead, która udostępniła licencję Roche i zarabia na każdym sprzedanym opakowaniu. Co ciekawe, zarządowi Gileadu przewodniczył swego czasu Donald Rumsfeld, były amerykański sekretarz obrony.
GSK (GlaxoSmithKline) także spodziewa się ciekawego bilansu za pierwsze półrocze. Firma produkuje Relenzę, wziewną alternatywę dla Tamiflu, którą można przyjmować w ciąży, a także maseczki antywirusowe, które zapewne będą szeroko używane w służbie zdrowia podczas oczekiwanego ponownego ataku epidemii jesienią. GSK jest też główną siłą stojącą za szczepionką przeciwko świńskiej grypie, która powinna znaleźć się w sprzedaży przed końcem roku. Dawka ma kosztować około 6 funtów.
GSK słusznie nie przejmuje się oskarżeniami o żerowanie na panice, argumentując, że firma wydała 2,5 miliarda funtów na opracowanie szczepionki. - GSK zarobi na świńskiej grypie, jednak tylko dlatego, że na to zapracowaliśmy – mówi dyrektor naczelny firmy, Andrew Witty. - Ponieśliśmy znaczne i długoterminowe ryzyko, poświęcając mnóstwo zasobów i prowadząc badania, których nikt inny się nie podjął, więc nie zamierzam przepraszać, że ta inwestycja nam się zwróci.
GSK planuje przekazać 50 milionów bezpłatnych dawek Światowej Organizacji Zdrowia do wykorzystania przez biedniejsze kraje. Gest godny odnotowania.
Aptekarze
Odżyła sprzedaż witamin, suplementów diety i innych artykułów mających zmniejszać ryzyko złapania świńskiej grypy. Jedna z sieci aptek doniosła w ubiegłym tygodniu, że siedmiokrotnie wzrosła liczba sprzedawanych termometrów, a ponieważ chorobę rozpoznaje się przede wszystkim na podstawie gorączki, aptekarze nie nadążają z uzupełnianiem zapasów.
Wiele aptek jest ponadto punktami odbioru Tamiflu, co oznacza dodatkowe obroty
Producenci mydła i chusteczek
Świetnie sprzedają się zwłaszcza antybakteryjne płyny i bezwodne żele do mycia rąk. (...) Prasa branżowa doniosła, że po rozpoczęciu w Wielkiej Brytanii rządowej kampanii pod hasłem „Złap, wyrzuć, zniszcz” dziesięciokrotnie wzrosła sprzedaż zestawów higienicznych, w skład których wchodzą dwa opakowania chusteczek antywirusowych i antybakteryjna pianka do rąk.
Doradcy zdrowotni
Jedną z najbardziej nagłośnionych grup ryzyka są ciężarne kobiety. Rząd wystosowuje sprzeczne zalecenia: powinny zachowywać się jak zwykle, czyli chodzić do pracy i korzystać z publicznego transportu, ponieważ świńska grypa ma łagodny przebieg, ale powinny też starać się unikać kontaktu z zarażonymi
Jedna z klinik dla kobiet w ciąży proponuje zmartwionym świńską grypą 15-minutowe telefoniczne konsultacje w cenie 45 funtów. Porada dotyczy głównie stylu życia, na przykład jak radzić sobie ze stresem, albo że trzeba dużo spać i jeść probiotyki. Za dodatkowe 30 funtów można sobie zbadać poziom witaminy D
Inna firma oferuje pakiet przeciwgrypowy w cenie 49 funtów plus VAT. W jego skład wchodzi internetowe badanie stanu zdrowia, recepta na lek przeciwwirusowy (najpewniej Tamiflu, ponieważ firma deklaruje, że używa tych samych środków co rząd).
Bezrobotni
Szukający pracy ustawili się w długich kolejkach, żeby zatrudnić się na trzy tygodnie (albo dłużej) w centrach informacyjnych Narodowego Programu Pandemii Grypy. Program konstruowano w takim pośpiechu, że od kandydatów nie wymagano nawet odbycia rozmowy kwalifikacyjnej – trzeba było tylko zapisać się na sześciogodzinne szkolenie. Szef firmy, która podpisała kontrakt na prowadzenie infolinii, chwalił się anonimowemu reporterowi, że na świńskiej grypie świetnie się zarabia.
Media
No tak, czas się przyznać. Świńska grypa wychodzi na dobre dziennikarzom, nie tylko dlatego, że nagle ludzie znów zainteresowali się czytaniem informacji (w sezonie letnim to nie byle jakie osiągnięcie). Nastąpił prawdziwy festiwal słownych gier i kalamburów ze świniami i grypą w roli głównej.(...)
Według Mariany Bettio, która monitoruje ruch na stronie internetowej „Timesa”, świńska grypa jest od tygodni najczęściej wyszukiwanym hasłem, na czym skorzystało wiele serwisów informacyjnych, w tym BBC i Times (szczyt przypadł w maju, kiedy pojawił się wirus).
Wirus wywołał też rozkwit internetowej pomysłowości. Jedno z forów marketingowych zamieściło stronę pod hasłem: „Świńska grypa na poziomie 6! Zyski skaczą do poziomu 10! Dlaczego jeszcze nie zarabiacie?” Forum uczy, jak zyskać na fakcie, że świńska grypa jest jednym z najgorętszych tematów w Google i proponuje sprzedaż artykułów o chorobie, które można zamieszczać na blogach i innych stronach internetowych pod własnym nazwiskiem. Za 37 dolarów można mieć na własność raport na 5 tysięcy słów, a do tego 10 wpisów na blogu. (…)
Inni potencjalni beneficjenci
Płatne parkingi: szykuje się złoty interes. Nikt nie chce spędzać dwóch godzin dziennie w autobusie czy metrze, trzymając się tych samych uchwytów co niezdrowo wyglądający współobywatele.
Taksówkarze: Jak wyżej. Jeżeli ktoś nie lubi prowadzić i nie ma ochoty na publiczny transport (a w dodatku ma trochę gotówki), rozwiązanie jest oczywiste.
Turystyka studencka: Marzył wam się kiedyś wyjazd do Meksyku za bezcen? Nadeszła wasza szansa.
Dołączył: 05 Mar 2009 Posty: 1459
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 17:52, 08 Sie '09
Temat postu:
W tekście który wkleiła Neira jest ciekawe zdanie ...
Cytat:
Firmy farmaceutyczne
Ceny akcji Roche oszalały. Zyski firm farmaceutycznych w obliczu pandemii idą w górę szybciej niż rtęć w termometrze. Oczekuje się, że do końca roku Roche sprzeda Tamiflu za 2 miliardy franków szwajcarskich - mało kto jednak wie, że lek został opracowany przez inną firmę, Gilead, która udostępniła licencję Roche i zarabia na każdym sprzedanym opakowaniu. Co ciekawe, zarządowi Gileadu przewodniczył swego czasu Donald Rumsfeld, były amerykański sekretarz obrony.
W linku powyżej macie roczny raport finasowy firmy CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO
dla inwestorów giełdowych za rok 2008 z prognozą na 2009 .
Firma CHUGAI PHARMACEUTICAL CO żeby było śmieszniej ( a może w sumie nie śmieszniej )
należy (52% udziałów czyli pakiet większościowy) do Hoffmann–La Roche o którym wspominał Times w artykule powyżej ....
Na stronie nr 5 czytamy o spadku sprzedarzy tamiflu w roku 2008
Cytat:
The biggest factor for the decline in revenues was the
fall in sales of the anti-influenza agent Tamiflu (down
¥30.3 billion, decrease of 78.3%)
Jednak na kolejnej stronie prognozowany wzrost sprzedarzy zobaczcie jaki !!!
(prognoza robiona zanim wybuchła epidemia świńskiej grypy)
strona nr.6
Cytat:
FY 2009 Outlook
For the year, we forecast sales of Tamiflu to reach ¥53.0
billion, up 531.0%, due to expected resumption of government
stockpiling in FY2009 and the ongoing recovery
of the prescription rate for seasonal influenza.
..............................Bez komentarza..................
_________________ Gaza Strefa śmierci
W zasadzie to samo co w Time'sie podali w dzisiejszych wydarzeniach na polsacie. Niby to z wielkim oburzeniem wytykają po kolei każdego kto zarabia na świńskiej grypie, w tym firmy farmaceutyczne. Jednak w między czasie pada informacja jakoby jedynym, skutecznym lekiem był obecnie Tamiflu (z tego co wiem ma tylko łagodzić objawy). Na koniec stwierdzenie, że możemy nie dokładać do tego całego interesu, no ale czy warto zaryzykować życie dla paru groszy...
Wysłany: 20:45, 09 Sie '09
Temat postu: Znaleźli tanie i dobre ZIOŁOWE lekarstwo na grypę A/H1N1?
Znaleźli tanie i dobre ZIOŁOWE lekarstwo na grypę A/H1N1?
Grypa A/H1N1 zatacza coraz szersze kręgi na całym świecie. Lekarze z Pekinu twierdzą, że znają rozwiązanie, jak pokonać ją szybko i tanio. Sposobem na walkę z chorobą ma być tradycyjne chińskie lekarstwo ziołowe. Lekarstwo może okazać się przełomem, bo oprócz tego, że jest skuteczne, jest też tańsze od innych leków, którymi leczeni są chorzy na grypę typu A/H1N1.
Już od dawna podziwiałem Chiny za ziołowe leki, jak w niektórych regionach kraju używają jedynie ziół a ludzie są bardzo zdrowi , (jak na obecną tam dietę i warunki)
_________________ Moja odpowiedź na zaczepki TROLL-i.
Dołączył: 20 Sie 2005 Posty: 20417
Post zebrał 0.000 mBTC Podarowałeś BTC
Wysłany: 12:33, 10 Sie '09
Temat postu:
Cytat:
Using New Laws for Swine Flu, Designed for a Much Deadlier Disease, May Create a Perfect Storm
1. The US government is using laws designed for dealing with a very deadly pandemic, or bioterrorism, to bring about a mass vaccination program for swine flu, beginning with the Public Readiness and Emergency Preparedness Act 0f 2006.
2. This law removes liability from the manufacturer, medical practitioners who use the product, and from "government program planners" who decided on using the law. A suit can only be brought if the DHHS Secretary allows it, and if there is willful misconduct on the part of the manufacturer.
This law has been invoked for swine flu drugs (Tamiflu and Relenza),
3. If testing of these products is very limited, then the manufacturers are unlikely to become aware of their flaws, and specifically their adverse effects. Then there can be no willful misconduct.
4. Due to the fear that swine flu will cause a large outbreak once students return to schools, where the virus might rapidly spread, the US government has stated that vaccine is likely to be available, and used, before clinical trials are completed.
WHO says vaccine will be ready in September. Novartis began testing in humans in July, and Sanofi-Aventis and Glaxo Smith Kline are starting now.
5. The adjuvants likely to be used to strengthen vaccines and stretch the supply are named MF59 (Novartis) and ASO3 (Glaxo Smith Kline). Only 3 vaccines using this type of adjuvant (oil-in-water, a.k.a. squalene-containing) have been licensed in Europe, and none have been given a license in the US. Two vaccines using these adjuvants are only used in people above the age of 65 (Fluad-MF59), and those with serious kidney disease (Fendrix-ASO4). Both advanced age and kidney failure weaken the immune system, so more powerful vaccines are needed, but in this population autoimmunity is unlikely to result from powerful immune stimulation. Cervarix is the third European vaccine (using adjuvant ASO4 against HPV) and its safety is controversial.
6. The then-Acting DHHS Secretary issued an Emergency Declaration in response to the swine flu epidemic on April 26, 2009. This allows use of unapproved (unlicensed) medical treatments and tests, or use of approved treatments for unapproved uses.
According to the Congressional Research Service, on April 27, 2009, the Food and Drug Administration issued four Emergency Use Authorizations (enacted in Section 564 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, amended by the Project BioShield Act of 2004) in response to requests from the CDC to make available certain drugs (Tamiflu and Relenza), diagnostic tests and respiratory protection devices.
7. Vaccines containing MF59 and ASO3 have not had Emergency Use Authorizations issued for them--yet. However, the government has purchased $698 million dollars' worth of these adjuvants in recent weeks.
US and WHO officials have indicated the likelihood of their use, which is the only way to achieve adequate amounts of vaccine for the US and world population in the fall.
8. These vaccines have never been demonstrated to be safe in children, pregnant women or young adults. They have not undergone comprehensive testing; for example, MF59 has not and will not be tested for carcinogenicity by the manufacturer.
9. The result of the new bioterrorism laws (passed with the expectation of use for much more dangerous epidemics than the current swine flu), which allow use of untested products AND give manufacturers an incentive to avoid comprehensive testing (to avoid being found guilty of willful misconduct) have combined with the political imperative to provide citizens with vaccines in a hurry, yielding a potential Perfect Storm.
In the 1976 swine flu vaccine program, 45 million people were vaccinated with an inadequately tested vaccine. The government gave the vaccine manufacturers immunity from liability, but created an alternative compensation program. Five thousand people sought benefits for vaccine injuries. Four hundred twenty seven developed the autoimmune, paralytic illness Guillain-Barre Syndrome. Over thirty of them died.
Experts have suggested that in the absence of prelicensure clinical trial data, it will be important to perform postmarketing surveillance to learn about the side effects from swine flu vaccines. According to Reuters, "the FDA's Dr. Hector Izurieta said the agency had set up an exceptionally extensive network for what is known as post-marketing surveillance."
Postmarketing surveillance may be sufficient to identify severe side effects when new drugs are marketed, as they only gradually come to be used by large numbers of patients. But for a vaccine that will be employed in a mass inoculation campaign, targeted at half or more of the US population, tens (or hundreds) of millions will be vaccinated in a few weeks, before sufficient time has elapsed to learn about the adverse effects.
Untested swine flu vaccines employing novel adjuvants, which are likely to cause more autoimmune illness than occurred in 1976, will almost certainly be used. The manufacturers have been given liability protection, as have the government program planners. Efficacy and safety are unknown. But no compensation mechanism has been created. And the public has not been informed.
Nie możesz pisać nowych tematów Nie możesz odpowiadać w tematach Nie możesz zmieniać swoich postów Nie możesz usuwać swoich postów Nie możesz głosować w ankietach Nie możesz moderować swoich tematów
Wiki2
Wykop2
Linki
Szukaj
Ekipa
Rejestracja
Zaloguj
Część z nich umieściłem pod osłoną nocy w skrzynkach pocztowych na osiedlu. Na jutro przygotowane są już plakaty samoprzylepne... na słupy ogłoszeniowe 
. Najgorsze w tym wszystkim jest to, że żona zaczyna się o mnie martwić... myśli, że mi odbiło 
